is a concern that just as in the Assembly will discuss important bills, eg. the societies of civil coexistence between people of same sex pensamaiento requiring progressive, reactionary people are appointed positions and positions of major importance at the constitutional level. I say it is disturbing because he has been appointed as judges of the Constitutional Court is precisely the same person who once was the INFORMANT by the PGR in the first case brought homosexual in nature. Yes, I speak of Dr. Fernando Castillo Víquez from the PGR who replied to the Constitutional Court (putting the biblical texts as a moral and religious arguments on almost every legal and constitutional grounds.)
Here is a small paragraph below that puts in clear evidence to the person who purchased the Constitutional Court on the Judiciary:
"CONSTITUTIONAL DIVISION OF THE SUPREME COURT OF UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTION No. 03-008127-0007-CO-Promoter: Yashin Castrillo Fernández. CONS: CLAUSE 6) OF ARTICLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FAMILY.
INFORMANT: Dr. Fernando Castillo Víquez
The undersigned, mindful ... show:
expressed in the character, and within the time granted by the decision of the 16: 15 hours September 2, 2003, notified on June 4, I appear to answer the audience granted to the Attorney General's Office unconstitutionality in No. 03-008127-0007-CO-raised by Yashin Castrillo Fernández.
As reported by the resolution, this process is promoted in order to be declared unconstitutional "... Article 14, paragraph 6) of the Family Code in stating that marriage is legally impossible for same-sex. Consider the plaintiff that this provision is contrary to the principle of equality, and to the principle of liberty under Article 28 of the Constitution, as it gives a discriminatory treatment of same-sex couples who want to legally formalize their relationship through marriage
I. - ON THE LEGITIMATE plaintiffs.
The actor's legitimacy comes from sections 73 to 79 of the Constitutional Jurisdiction Act, particularly the provision that required to bring an action of unconstitutionality of the existence of a matter pending resolution in the courts, including the habeas corpus or amparo, or the procedure for exhaustion of administrative remedies, as it is claimed that constitutional as a reasonable means of preserving the right or interest that is considered injured. In the present case, there is a judicial process (request for the holding of civil marriage) proposed by the plaintiff before the Family Court of Alajuela, which is being reviewed under judicial record 03-400952-292-FA, which is currently pending resolution on appeal. In view of the above, is consistent with the law by the Constitutional Court to examine this action by the fund.
II .- THE FUND.
Before entering the substance of the case, it is important to consider that just read the Preamble to the Constitution, where the 1949 Constituent Assembly called upon the name of God, and its numeral 74, which collects the Christian principle of social justice, to conclude, without much effort, which the law of the Constitution includes a concept of marriage very specific and unique: the monogamous heterosexual. However, when the original constituent calls on the name of God and Christian principles, it is obvious that he is referring to the Triune God (Father, Son and Holy Spirit), whose teachings are found in the Gospels and the teaching of the Apostles, which result in the kind of marriage exclusively constitutionalised and therefore the exclusion of any other. In our view, this would be enough to make, based on Article 9 of the Constitutional Jurisdiction Act, has been rejected by this action by the fund as interlocutory. "
Attorney 2 ...(???) I was like Dr. Castillo, now appointed by the assembly in the office of judge of the Constitutional Court, and in a conversation astronomy and quantum physics, I literally told me "If it is in the Bible, there ...". That judge is an attorney I am happy, but I worry that such charges importance of which are backward people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment